<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
>

<channel>
	<title>Acme Voiceworx &#187; Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/category/radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com</link>
	<description>Analog isn't dead -- it just smells funny.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:18:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
		<item>
		<title>Sound Forge Pro 10 reviewed in November 2009 RAP</title>
		<link>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2009/11/03/sound-forge-pro-10-in-november-2009-rap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2009/11/03/sound-forge-pro-10-in-november-2009-rap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sound Forge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The major improvements in Sound Forge Pro 10 are in workflow and in the user interface, and these are substantial. I like it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The November issue of <a href="http://www.rapmag.com">Radio &amp; Production</a> magazine features my review of Sony Software&#8217;s latest release of Sound Forge, labeled Pro 10. You won&#8217;t find a lot of new features, but there are a couple that are compelling enough. No, the major improvements are in workflow and in the user interface, and these are substantial. I like it.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s kinda funny is that Sony pulled a quote from my review and used it in an email campaign advertising a free webinar on Forge 10:</p>
<blockquote><p>Steve Cunningham, (Radio and Production Nov 2009) writes &#8220;Sound Forge Pro 10 is to version 9 as a 2010 Ford Mustang is to a 1969 Boss Mustang&#8230; still wicked fast, still sounds like business, but so much easier to drive.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t misunderstand me&#8230; I like publicity as much as anyone, and the pull is a direct quote &#8212; yup, I wrote that. What&#8217;s amusing is that at no time did I ever speak to anyone at Sony Software, either before or after I wrote the review. Furthermore, I bought the upgrade and paid for it myself (which I think is as it should be). But my contact info is in there at the end of the article. I&#8217;d have thought they&#8217;d send a note asking if I objected to their use of it, or at least telling me they were going to use it.</p>
<p>Makes me go &#8220;hmmm&#8230;&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2009/11/03/sound-forge-pro-10-in-november-2009-rap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radio: just another iPod app</title>
		<link>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2009/06/01/radio-just-another-ipod-app/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2009/06/01/radio-just-another-ipod-app/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zune]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is interesting is the one Zune HD feature that Mr. Breen thinks not much of a feature at all: Radio.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is comparing their new, upcoming Zune HD to Apple&#8217;s iPod Touch. In an interview with <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10249364-56.html" target="_blank">c|net&#8217;s Ina Fried</a>, the GM of Zune global marketing went so as far as to say &#8220;This device is created to go head to head with the iPod Touch.&#8221; That&#8217;s debatable, according to Christopher Breen writing in <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/140811/2009/05/zunehd_ipodtouch.html?lsrc=nl_mwweek_h_cbstories" target="_blank">MacWorld</a> online.<a title="ZuneHD" rel="lightbox[pics344]" href="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/zune-hd_pjqvm_54.jpg"><img class="attachment wp-att-354" src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/zune-hd_pjqvm_54.thumbnail.jpg" alt="ZuneHD" width="200" height="188" align="right" /></a></p>
<p>I say, big deal. So the Microsoft Zune flack gets dissed by the iPod/iPhone/iSteve flack. Whatever. What <em>is</em> interesting is the one Zune HD feature that Mr. Breen thinks not much of a feature at all:</p>
<p>Radio. HD Radio, at that. Here&#8217;s his quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230;Microsoft, from all appearances, is jamming its fingers in its ears and sing-songing “iPod! iPod! iPod! We have radio, iPod doesn’t!” as if <em>radio</em>, of all things, is the killer app (which, if you really want it on your iPod touch, can be had via one of a handful of apps).&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The inference is clear and comes right out of <a href="http://www.insidemusicmedia.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Jerry Del Colliano&#8217;s</a> playbook. Radio? That old thing? What&#8217;s next? A built-in ashtray and cigarette lighter? Goodness, why did Microsoft even bother?</p>
<p>This devaluation of radio is not surprising, coming from an iPod fan. However, what I find jarring is how quickly radio has become just one of 10,000 other 99 cent apps that can be installed on your iPod.</p>
<p>That is, if you <em>really</em> want it in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2009/06/01/radio-just-another-ipod-app/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AKG Perception mics in April 2009 issue of RAP</title>
		<link>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2009/03/18/akg-perception-mics-in-april-2009-issue-of-rap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2009/03/18/akg-perception-mics-in-april-2009-issue-of-rap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can AKG's latest line of inexpensive Chinese-made microphones maintain the company's stellar reputation? How well do they stack up against the competition?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the April 2009 issue of Radio &amp; Production magazine I&#8217;m taking a look at the AKG Perception line of microphones.<a title="akg_perception_mics" rel="lightbox[pics163]" href="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/perceptionmics.jpg"><img class="attachment wp-att-164 alignright" src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/perceptionmics.thumbnail.jpg" alt="akg_perception_mics" width="200" height="164" /></a></p>
<p>AKG has a long and storied reputation for producing some of the best studio mics around &#8212; can you say 414? &#8212; but can their latest line of inexpensive Chinese-made microphones maintain that reputation? How well do they stack up against the competition?</p>
<p>The short answer is yes, mostly. Read RAP for the whole story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2009/03/18/akg-perception-mics-in-april-2009-issue-of-rap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Senate Joins the Webcast Fray</title>
		<link>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/05/12/us-senate-joins-the-webcast-fray/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/05/12/us-senate-joins-the-webcast-fray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 23:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SoundExchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/05/12/us-senate-joins-the-webcast-fray/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like SoundExchange and the RIAA will be defending their indefensible royalty rates on two fronts &#8212; the US Senate has introduced S. 1353, The Internet Radio Equality Act. Along with H.R. 2060 (which is approaching 100 co-sponsors), this bill would vacate the Copyright Royalty Board&#8217;s recent decision to charge webcasters both small and large [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like SoundExchange and the RIAA will be defending their indefensible royalty rates on two fronts &#8212; the US Senate has introduced S. 1353, The Internet Radio Equality Act. Along with H.R. 2060 (which is approaching 100 co-sponsors), this bill would vacate the Copyright Royalty Board&#8217;s recent decision to charge webcasters both small and large a higher rate than is paid by even satellite radio (and certainly higher than what AM and FM currently pay).</p>
<p>Webcasters are still in need of public support, which you can show <a href="http://www.savenetradio.org/" title="SaveNetRadio.org" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acmevoiceworx.com%2F2007%2F05%2F12%2Fus-senate-joins-the-webcast-fray%2F&amp;linkname=US%20Senate%20Joins%20the%20Webcast%20Fray" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/twitter.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Twitter"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acmevoiceworx.com%2F2007%2F05%2F12%2Fus-senate-joins-the-webcast-fray%2F&amp;linkname=US%20Senate%20Joins%20the%20Webcast%20Fray" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/facebook.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Facebook"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/digg?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acmevoiceworx.com%2F2007%2F05%2F12%2Fus-senate-joins-the-webcast-fray%2F&amp;linkname=US%20Senate%20Joins%20the%20Webcast%20Fray" title="Digg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/digg.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Digg"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/delicious?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acmevoiceworx.com%2F2007%2F05%2F12%2Fus-senate-joins-the-webcast-fray%2F&amp;linkname=US%20Senate%20Joins%20the%20Webcast%20Fray" title="Delicious" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/delicious.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Delicious"/></a> <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save">Share/Save</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/05/12/us-senate-joins-the-webcast-fray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Radio Gets a Reprieve, HR 2060</title>
		<link>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/05/03/internet-radio-gets-a-reprieve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/05/03/internet-radio-gets-a-reprieve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 09:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/05/09/internet-radio-gets-a-reprieve/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two bills on Internet Radio are moving through Congress.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Copyright Royalty Board has moved the date on which its new, predatory royalty rates for streamers take effect from May 15th to July 15th. This makes it more likely that the Internet Radio Equality Act (H.R. 2060), currently moving through Congress, will indeed pass in time to head off this catastrophe for small webcasters.</p>
<p>Stay abreast of all the developments <a href="http://www.kurthanson.com" title="Radio and Internet Newsletter" target="_blank">here</a>, and show your support by taking action as suggested <a href="http://www.savenetradio.org/" title="SaveNetRadio.org" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/05/03/internet-radio-gets-a-reprieve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back from NAB</title>
		<link>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/04/23/back-from-nab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/04/23/back-from-nab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/04/23/back-from-nab/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best of the National Association of Broadcasters Convention.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t go to as many shows as I used to, and I forget how much work it really is to properly &#8220;do&#8221; a tradeshow like NAB. They&#8217;re claiming over 106,000 attendees, and I&#8217;m inclined to believe them.</p>
<p>So what was hot?  The Red One digital camera, that&#8217;s what. Hands down, the hottest item at the entire show.</p>
<p>Rather than list all the feeds and speeds here, I&#8217;ll simply point you to their <a href="http://www.red.com/" title="www.red.com" target="_blank">website</a> where you can see it all for yourself. But I will tell you that the images produced by this thing are stunning. These guys really did it right, and the fact that they were able to get a &#8220;custom&#8221; codec included in Apple&#8217;s new Final Cut Studio 2 (one of the other &#8220;hots&#8221;) represents a coup. I&#8217;m much more a sound guy than a video guy, but I want a Red One digital camera, period.<span id="more-33"></span></p>
<p>In the Radio hall it was great to spend some time with the folks from OMT, who have given their iMediaTouch automation software a nice facelift. Much cleaner-looking. With the merger of RCS and Prophet Systems (yielding one unit to be known as RCS), there&#8217;s one less player in the automation business, although PSI&#8217;s products will go on. In particular, their small Player 101 looks like interesting provided it has enough functionality for logging and converting show segments to uploadable mp3. Even small stations need the ability to convert content and make it downloadable &#8212; in some ways they need it more than do larger stations.</p>
<p>Finally, I was please to spend time with Steve Church of Telos, who not only took me thorough their Axia range of AoIP products (Audio over Internet Protocol), but even let me sit in the BMW where I listened to a surround HD broadcast of a morning show. I&#8217;m a surround skeptic, but I have to admit it was fun to feel like I was in the middle of a morning zoo show while sitting in the driver&#8217;s seat.</p>
<p>Enough for now, but more later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/04/23/back-from-nab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CRB + RIAA = 0 x NetRadio</title>
		<link>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/04/18/crb-riaa-0-x-netradio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/04/18/crb-riaa-0-x-netradio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/04/18/crb-riaa-0-x-netradio/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Monday the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) declined to hear requests to reconsider its ruling that raises the royalties Internet radio stations pay to record labels by about 300%, retroactive to January 2006. It&#8217;s widely believed that this move will put small- and medium-sized webcasters into bankruptcy, and will essentially mean the end of Internet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Monday the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) declined to hear requests to reconsider its ruling that raises the royalties Internet radio stations pay to record labels by about 300%, retroactive to January 2006. It&#8217;s widely believed that this move will put small- and medium-sized webcasters into bankruptcy, and will essentially mean the end of Internet radio as we know it.</p>
<p>This is not about whether composers, artists, and labels should be paid &#8212; they should. It&#8217;s about how much to pay them. It&#8217;s about whether a nascent industry will be allowed to grow, independent of the corporate megaliths inadvertently formed by the ill-conceived Telecom Act of 1996.<span id="more-30"></span></p>
<p>In my opinion the CRB&#8217;s ruling is wrong in so many ways that I scarcely know where to begin, but it&#8217;s hostile to both artists and consumers. More ominous still are the rumblings from SoundExchange, the RIAA&#8217;s online collection agency, that collecting artist and label royalties from AM and FM radio stations is a good idea, too. Here&#8217;s SoundExchange&#8217;s John Simson <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/16/AR2007031600514_2.html" title="Washington Post, March 18, 2007" target="_blank">in the Washington Post</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Where webcasters and the recording industry do agree is on the unfairness of making tiny Web stations pay for performance rights while huge radio companies pay nothing. Congress decided that Web stations must pay royalties to the composers of each song and to the performers and record labels, even as traditional AM and FM broadcasters continue paying only the composers &#8212; a quirk in the law that gives broadcast radio a huge advantage.</p>
<p>Simson agrees that &#8220;there&#8217;s really no justification for broadcast radio not paying, and we&#8217;re going to try to address that.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>You can read the background on this ruling at <a href="http://www.kurthanson.com" title="Radio and Internet Newsletter" target="_blank">RAIN</a>, and can get the legal-beagle 411 at David Oxenford&#8217;s <a href="http://www.broadcastlawblog.com/archives/cat-internet-radio.html" title="Broadcast Law Blog" target="_blank">Broadcast Law Blog</a>. More importantly, you can send a message to your Congressperson by signing the petition at <a href="http://www.savenetradio.org" title="SaveNetRadio.org" target="_blank">SaveNetRadio.org</a>. The new rates go into effect May 15th, so please don&#8217;t dawdle.</p>
<p>Sign up and send a message. It&#8217;s pretty much the only avenue left.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acmevoiceworx.com%2F2007%2F04%2F18%2Fcrb-riaa-0-x-netradio%2F&amp;linkname=CRB%20%2B%20RIAA%20%3D%200%20x%20NetRadio" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/twitter.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Twitter"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acmevoiceworx.com%2F2007%2F04%2F18%2Fcrb-riaa-0-x-netradio%2F&amp;linkname=CRB%20%2B%20RIAA%20%3D%200%20x%20NetRadio" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/facebook.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Facebook"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/digg?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acmevoiceworx.com%2F2007%2F04%2F18%2Fcrb-riaa-0-x-netradio%2F&amp;linkname=CRB%20%2B%20RIAA%20%3D%200%20x%20NetRadio" title="Digg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/digg.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Digg"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/delicious?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acmevoiceworx.com%2F2007%2F04%2F18%2Fcrb-riaa-0-x-netradio%2F&amp;linkname=CRB%20%2B%20RIAA%20%3D%200%20x%20NetRadio" title="Delicious" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/delicious.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Delicious"/></a> <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save">Share/Save</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/04/18/crb-riaa-0-x-netradio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we done with Imus yet?</title>
		<link>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/04/11/are-we-done-with-imus-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/04/11/are-we-done-with-imus-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 03:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/04/11/are-we-done-with-imus-yet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really hope we&#8217;re done with it. His remarks were ugly and indefensible, and so was the MSM&#8217;s reaction and behaviors in response to it. There&#8217;s blood in the water, and it&#8217;s the blood of the media eating one of its own. Everybody loses.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope we&#8217;re done with it. His remarks were ugly and indefensible, and so was the MSM&#8217;s reaction and behaviors in response to it. There&#8217;s blood in the water, and it&#8217;s the blood of the media eating one of its own.</p>
<p>Everybody loses.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acmevoiceworx.com%2F2007%2F04%2F11%2Fare-we-done-with-imus-yet%2F&amp;linkname=Are%20we%20done%20with%20Imus%20yet%3F" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/twitter.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Twitter"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acmevoiceworx.com%2F2007%2F04%2F11%2Fare-we-done-with-imus-yet%2F&amp;linkname=Are%20we%20done%20with%20Imus%20yet%3F" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/facebook.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Facebook"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/digg?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acmevoiceworx.com%2F2007%2F04%2F11%2Fare-we-done-with-imus-yet%2F&amp;linkname=Are%20we%20done%20with%20Imus%20yet%3F" title="Digg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/digg.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Digg"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/delicious?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acmevoiceworx.com%2F2007%2F04%2F11%2Fare-we-done-with-imus-yet%2F&amp;linkname=Are%20we%20done%20with%20Imus%20yet%3F" title="Delicious" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/delicious.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Delicious"/></a> <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save">Share/Save</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/2007/04/11/are-we-done-with-imus-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
