<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
>

<channel>
	<title>Acme Voiceworx &#187; Sound Forge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/tag/sound-forge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com</link>
	<description>Analog isn&#039;t dead -- it just smells funny.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:52:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
		<item>
		<title>Sound Forge Pro 10 reviewed in November 2009 RAP</title>
		<link>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/sound-forge-pro-10-in-november-2009-rap/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sound-forge-pro-10-in-november-2009-rap</link>
		<comments>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/sound-forge-pro-10-in-november-2009-rap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sound Forge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmevoiceworx.com.php5-22.dfw1-2.websitetestlink.com/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The major improvements in Sound Forge Pro 10 are in workflow and in the user interface, and these are substantial. I like it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The November issue of <a href="http://www.rapmag.com">Radio &amp; Production</a> magazine features my review of Sony Software&#8217;s latest release of Sound Forge, labeled Pro 10. You won&#8217;t find a lot of new features, but there are a couple that are compelling enough. No, the major improvements are in workflow and in the user interface, and these are substantial. I like it.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s kinda funny is that Sony pulled a quote from my review and used it in an email campaign advertising a free webinar on Forge 10:</p>
<blockquote><p>Steve Cunningham, (Radio and Production Nov 2009) writes &#8220;Sound Forge Pro 10 is to version 9 as a 2010 Ford Mustang is to a 1969 Boss Mustang&#8230; still wicked fast, still sounds like business, but so much easier to drive.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t misunderstand me&#8230; I like publicity as much as anyone, and the pull is a direct quote &#8212; yup, I wrote that. What&#8217;s amusing is that at no time did I ever speak to anyone at Sony Software, either before or after I wrote the review. Furthermore, I bought the upgrade and paid for it myself (which I think is as it should be). But my contact info is in there at the end of the article. I&#8217;d have thought they&#8217;d send a note asking if I objected to their use of it, or at least telling me they were going to use it.</p>
<p>Makes me go &#8220;hmmm&#8230;&#8221;.</p>
<div class="fullcircle-social-links" style="display: block;"></div><div style="clear: both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/sound-forge-pro-10-in-november-2009-rap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming Up in RAP &#8211; Sound Forge 9</title>
		<link>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/coming-up-%e2%80%93sound-forge-9/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=coming-up-%25e2%2580%2593sound-forge-9</link>
		<comments>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/coming-up-%e2%80%93sound-forge-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sound Forge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acmevoiceworx.com.php5-22.dfw1-2.websitetestlink.com/2007/05/06/coming-up-%e2%80%93-sound-forge-9/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An in-depth review of Sound Forge 9 from Sony.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony&#8217;s Sound Forge version 9 is out&#8230; how good is it? Is it worth upgrading from version 8 or earlier? We&#8217;ll soon see, as I have a copy coming for the June issue of Radio &amp; Production magazine.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using version 8 for a year or so, but I still think version 5 was the best since Sony bought Sonic Foundry&#8217;s product line. Simple, solid, and very stable.</p>
<p>Variation on an old joke: how many old audio editors does it take to install a new version of software? Five. One to install it, and four to talk about how good the old version was.</p>
<p>Sorry. That sucked, didn&#8217;t it?</p>
<div class="fullcircle-social-links" style="display: block;"></div><div style="clear: both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acmevoiceworx.com/coming-up-%e2%80%93sound-forge-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

